| Online Indoor Football League | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 OIFL Standings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Western Conference | Legend | Western Conference Playoffs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pacific Division | Overall | DIV | CON | NON | HM | RD | GP | Games Played | 1) San Antonio | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | W | L | PCT | PF | PA | SM | PFA | PAA | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | STK | W | Wins | 8) Venice | |||||||
| x-Los Angeles | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0.813 | 766 | 614 | 152 | 47.9 | 38.4 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 2 | W4 | L | Losses | ||||||||
| x-Tucson | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0.813 | 711 | 561 | 150 | 44.4 | 35.1 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 2 | W2 | PCT | Winning Percentage | ||||||||
| x-Venice | 16 | 10 | 6 | 0.625 | 667 | 605 | 62 | 41.7 | 37.8 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 5 | W1 | PF | Points For | 4) Tucson | |||||||
| o-San Francisco | 16 | 9 | 7 | 0.563 | 748 | 700 | 48 | 46.8 | 43.8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | L2 | PA | Points Against | 5) Texas | |||||||
| San Diego | 16 | 4 | 12 | 0.250 | 596 | 692 | (96) | 37.3 | 43.3 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | L5 | SM | Scoring Margin | ||||||||
| g-North Dakota | 16 | 3 | 13 | 0.188 | 585 | 729 | (144) | 36.6 | 45.6 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | L1 | PFA | Points For Avg. | ||||||||
| 4073 | 3901 | PAA | Points Against Avg. | 2) Los Angeles | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Northwest Division | Overall | DIV | CON | NON | HM | RD | DIV | Division Record | 7) Rocky Mountain | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | W | L | PCT | PF | PA | SM | PFA | PAA | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | STK | CON | Conference Record | ||||||||
| x-Vancouver Island | 16 | 12 | 4 | 0.750 | 687 | 615 | 72 | 42.9 | 38.4 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 4 | W1 | NON | Non-Conf. Record | ||||||||
| x-Portland | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0.688 | 671 | 612 | 59 | 41.9 | 38.3 | 8 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | W6 | HM | Home Record | 3) Vancouver Island | |||||||
| x-Rocky Mountain | 16 | 10 | 6 | 0.625 | 673 | 589 | 84 | 42.1 | 36.8 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | W1 | RD | Road Record | 6) Portland | |||||||
| o-Spokane | 16 | 9 | 7 | 0.563 | 668 | 634 | 34 | 41.8 | 39.6 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | L1 | STK | Win/Loss Streak | ||||||||
| g-Eugene | 16 | 2 | 14 | 0.125 | 518 | 687 | (169) | 32.4 | 42.9 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 8 | L1 | Eastern Conference Playoffs | |||||||||
| g-Omaha | 16 | 1 | 15 | 0.063 | 448 | 687 | (239) | 28.0 | 42.9 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 8 | L11 | Legend | 1) Evansville | ||||||||
| 3665 | 3824 | z - clinched home field | 8) Cincinnati | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Southwest Division | Overall | DIV | CON | NON | HM | RD | y - clinched division | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | W | L | PCT | PF | PA | SM | PFA | PAA | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | STK | x - clinched playoff berth | |||||||||
| 1-San Antonio | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0.813 | 626 | 480 | 146 | 39.1 | 30.0 | 9 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 1 | W7 | 1 - clinched #1 seed in conference | 4) Kansas City | ||||||||
| x-Texas | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0.688 | 674 | 597 | 77 | 42.1 | 37.3 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | L1 | o - clinched OIT berth | 5) Long Island | ||||||||
| Houston | 16 | 6 | 10 | 0.375 | 601 | 692 | (91) | 37.6 | 43.3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | W1 | g - clinched gravy bowl berth | |||||||||
| Washington | 16 | 5 | 11 | 0.313 | 633 | 673 | (40) | 39.6 | 42.1 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 6 | W1 | & - eliminated from playoffs (pre week 17) | |||||||||
| College Station | 16 | 4 | 12 | 0.250 | 511 | 615 | (104) | 31.9 | 38.4 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 7 | L1 | 2) New England | |||||||||
| Arkansas | 16 | 3 | 13 | 0.188 | 486 | 670 | (184) | 30.4 | 41.9 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | L4 | Tie-Breakers (DIV) | 7) St. Louis | ||||||||
| 3531 | 3727 | 1. Overall Record | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. Head-to-Head | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eastern Conference | 3. Division Record | 3) Tampa Bay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Midwest Division | Overall | DIV | CON | NON | HM | RD | 4. Common Games | 6) Detroit | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | W | L | PCT | PF | PA | SM | PFA | PAA | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | STK | 5. Conference Record | |||||||||
| 1-Evansville | 16 | 14 | 2 | 0.875 | 721 | 600 | 121 | 45.1 | 37.5 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1 | L1 | 6. Strength of Victory | OIFLCup IX | ||||||||
| x-Kansas City | 16 | 14 | 2 | 0.875 | 670 | 507 | 163 | 41.9 | 31.7 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 2 | W4 | 7. Strength of Schedule | |||||||||
| x-St. Louis | 16 | 9 | 7 | 0.563 | 700 | 647 | 53 | 43.8 | 40.4 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | L3 | 8. Scoring Margin | |||||||||
| o-Cedar Valley | 16 | 9 | 7 | 0.563 | 726 | 679 | 47 | 45.4 | 42.4 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | W1 | 9. Points For | Thomas & Mack Center, Las Vegas, NV | ||||||||
| o-Fort Dodge | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0.500 | 753 | 671 | 82 | 47.1 | 41.9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | W2 | 10. Points Against | |||||||||
| g-Wisconsin | 16 | 1 | 15 | 0.063 | 452 | 744 | (292) | 28.3 | 46.5 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 8 | L15 | OIFL Invitational Tournament | |||||||||
| 4022 | 3848 | Tie-Breakers (CON) | 1) San Francisco | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Northeast Division | Overall | DIV | CON | NON | HM | RD | 1. Overall Record | 8) New Orleans | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | W | L | PCT | PF | PA | SM | PFA | PAA | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | STK | 2. Head-to-Head | |||||||||
| y-New England | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0.813 | 707 | 533 | 174 | 44.2 | 33.3 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 3 | W1 | 3. Conference Record | |||||||||
| x-Long Island | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0.813 | 724 | 521 | 203 | 45.3 | 32.6 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 3 | L1 | 4. Common Games | 4) D.C. | ||||||||
| x-Detroit | 16 | 12 | 4 | 0.750 | 569 | 489 | 80 | 35.6 | 30.6 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 2 | W10 | 5. Strength of Victory | 5) Fort Dodge | ||||||||
| o-Buffalo | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0.500 | 653 | 566 | 87 | 40.8 | 35.4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | L1 | 6. Strength of Schedule | |||||||||
| Connecticut | 16 | 4 | 12 | 0.250 | 590 | 687 | (97) | 36.9 | 42.9 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 6 | W1 | 7. Scoring Margin | |||||||||
| Philadelphia | 16 | 1 | 15 | 0.063 | 468 | 746 | (278) | 29.3 | 46.6 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 7 | L6 | 8. Points For | 2) Cedar Valley | ||||||||
| 3711 | 3542 | 9. Points Against | 7) Baltimore | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Atlantic Division | Overall | DIV | CON | NON | HM | RD | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Team | GP | W | L | PCT | PF | PA | SM | PFA | PAA | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | W | L | STK | ||||||||||
| y-Tampa Bay | 16 | 12 | 4 | 0.750 | 883 | 727 | 156 | 55.2 | 45.4 | 9 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 3 | L1 | 3) Spokane | |||||||||
| x-Cincinnati | 16 | 9 | 7 | 0.563 | 835 | 764 | 71 | 52.2 | 47.8 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 | W3 | 6) Buffalo | |||||||||
| o-D.C. | 16 | 9 | 7 | 0.563 | 667 | 641 | 26 | 41.7 | 40.1 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | W2 | ||||||||||
| o-Baltimore | 16 | 7 | 9 | 0.438 | 637 | 627 | 10 | 39.8 | 39.2 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | W1 | OIT Championship | |||||||||
| o-New Orleans | 16 | 5 | 11 | 0.313 | 659 | 662 | (3) | 41.2 | 41.4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | L3 | ||||||||||
| Miami | 16 | 1 | 15 | 0.063 | 480 | 900 | (420) | 30.0 | 56.3 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 8 | L7 | ||||||||||
| 4161 | 4321 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gravy Bowl (winner earns E1-1 pick) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 1) North Dakota | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4) Wisconsin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2) Eugene | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3) Omaha | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||